1. When a child is born, there is an angle of cyclicality: Experiential dawning light, and the descent of the "experiential dawn"--we live we die. But, as a child the first form of communication, and education arguably, is oral. We simply, by nature it seems, are storytellers even in casual speech. As nature emanates cycles upon us, it revolves to resolve that the stories we first created (and later of course write) would be cyclical in nature. This is why we reuse and recycle stories. The ocean we drink from, the entity it is, whether intellectually created or not, owns powers of hypnosis. Isn't any form of entertainment a hypnosis? where time seems skewed? a state of mind elevated from regular altitudes? just like reading a book? or listening to music or a story? having a drink? and the long flowing thoughts that stream like a questionmark? just like the fictional body of water? The reasons for fiction is to keep a flowing entity alive and sanity.
2. Real people and stories are more concrete to this world than that of fiction.
3. Have you heard the phrase, "What's the moral of the story?" Enough said, unless you don't like morals.
4. I like me a good story.
5. Non-fiction sells waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay better than fiction.
6. If perceptive experience is the single truth a being can truly know, then unless a perfect replica (I think I have to say in that particular time and space, as of now impossible) is made, everything ever told from experience is keeping us farther from the truth. Just for kicks you could say that an idea exists in a physical being. Is that idea outside the realm of this universe, perceptive spectrum perhaps, but the entire void? Is all fiction true because it was created in what most people would call a physical mind, then truth is false and falsities are truth? Perhaps we just shouldn't care about it.
